Mises’ Calculation Argument: a Clarification
نویسنده
چکیده
IN THIS ARTICLE I WILL DISCUSS MISES’ FAMOUS argument concerning economic calculation under socialism. I will point out that there are in fact two components of this argument. The first part deals with the fact that in capitalist economies, factors of production are allocated based on profit-andloss calculations in terms of (money) prices. Inasmuch as such calculations cannot be performed under socialism (since there are no markets for such goods, and hence, no prices), socialism must resort to some other means of calculation to rationally allocate factors of production. The second part of the argument deals with the fact that previous proposals for socialist calculation (e.g. calculation in kind, calculation in terms of labor units, etc.) are highly deficient and, indeed, the very notion of a value calculus is chimerical. Thus can it be concluded that rational economic action under socialism is impossible. I further point out that much subsequent Austrian work on calculation has tended to conflate these two separate issues, and has consequently led to some confusion about the essence of Mises’ argument.
منابع مشابه
Current Developments in Cost Accounting and the Dynamics of Economic Calculation
The role of accounting as articulated in Austrian economic theory is securely fastened to the task of economic calculation. Ludwig von Mises distinguishes between prospective or anticipative calculation involving the “precalculation of expected costs and expected proceeds” relating to a planned course of action and retrospective calculation that establishes the results of past action, the “acco...
متن کاملA Final Word: Calculation, Knowledge, and Appraisement
Leland Yeager's rejoinder "Salerno on Calculation, Knowledge, and Appraisement" (1996) merits a final word, because I believe it makes a subtle though very important concession to the argument made by Rothbard, Herbener, and myself regarding the function of the price system. Before addressing this issue, I will offer comments relating to two other points raised by Yeager in his rejoinder. 1.Yea...
متن کاملMonetary Calculation and Mises's Critique of Planning
Over the last decade or so, there has been a renewed interest in the problems of economic calculation under socialism and a rethinking of the classic socialist calculation debate of the interwar era. A great deal of this work has been stimulated by Don Lavoie's (1985) reinterpretation of the debate that suggested a fundamental misunderstanding of the Austrian argument. In addition, the general ...
متن کاملCalculation, Complexity And Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Once Again
This paper offers a reassessment of the socialist calculation debate, and examines the extent to which the conclusions of that debate must be modified in the light of the subsequent development of the theory and technology of computation. Following an introduction to the two main perspectives on the debate which have been offered to date, we examine the classic case mounted by von Mises against...
متن کاملDid Mises Err? Was He a Utilitarian?: Reply to Block
Walter Block's critique of my paper fails to address the main argument. It is that Ludwig von Mises's support for laissez faire comes from a comparison of the systems recommended by the ideologies of socialism, interventionism, and liberalism. Mises compares these systems according to the criterion of their capacity to achieve the goal of satisfying material wants, which is either explicit or i...
متن کامل